Arizona Prop 102 and California Prop 8
Many people ask the question “What’s wrong with 2 people of the same sex consenting to marriage and sex?” Let’s look at it from a logical argument.
HOMOSEXUAL PREMISE:
All people consenting to marriage or sex are legal.
Homosexuals consenting to marriage or sex are people.
Therefore, homosexuals consenting to marriage or sex is legal
PEDOPHILE PREMISE:
All people consenting to marriage or sex are legal.
Pedophiles and children consenting to marriage or sex are people.
Therefore, Pedophiles and children consenting to marriage or sex is legal
CONCLUSION:
There is an obvious fallacy with a homosexual’s argument in “All people consenting to marriage or sex are legal.”
Why? Because every country in the world has their own laws regarding of “age of consent.” As stated in my earlier examples, many countries have much lower age of consent laws (i.e. Japan 13 years old and Mexico 13 years old.)
Perhaps you will argue we all live in the US. Then you would fall in another fallacy based on ethnocentricism – where a culture thinks their culture is more superior than other cultures.
In conclusion, a YES vote for prop 8 and prop 102 is a vote for logical reasoning.
California: Yes on Prop 8
Arizona: Yes on Prop 102
Leave a Reply
